Sammel v President Brand Gold Mining Company Ltd 1969 (3) SA 629A at 678. Thus the mere loss of confidence in the management of the company's affairs with the result that …
v President Brand Gold Mining Co Ltd[9] by Trollip JA, that majority shareholders could not use the power to "discriminate between themselves and the minority shareholders so …
As stated by Trollip JA in Sammel & others v President Brand Gold Mining Co Ltd 1969 (3) SA 629 (A) at 678G-H: 'By becoming a shareholder in a company a person …
Others v President Brand Gold Mining Co Ltd 1969 (3) SA 629 (A) at 662F). [5] In the court a quo the learned judge had regard to the respondent's financial statements for the …
18Sammel v President Brand Gold Mining Co Ltd 1969 (3)SA 629 (A)para678Trollip J firmly noted:'By becoming a shareholder in a company a person undertakes by his …
v President Brand Gold Mining Co Ltd 1969 (3) SA 629 (A) Trollip JA said that the 'principle of the supremacy of the majority is essential to the proper functioning of …
This principle is called Majority rule principle in the case of Trollip JA and Ors v President Brand Gold Mining Co. 1969 (3) SA 629 (A) stating the reluctance of courts to …
See also Sammel v President Brand, above at note 1 at 699–706, where the appeal court stated that the law is only concerned with the registered holder of the …
Sub-. "345. When company deemed unable to pay its debts.‒(1) A company or body corporate shall be deemed to be unable to pay its debts if‒ (a) a creditor, by cession or …
1Sammel v President Brand Gold Mining Co Ltd1969 (3) SA 629 (A) at 678. 2PA Delport (ed) Henochsberg on the Companies Act 71 of 2008(Service Issue 17) 574(12) and the …